Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Un-silent's avatar

Good word Rev Robert, thank you.

Alamo Dude's avatar

And Yet, a large number of Jesus’s followers were revolted at the thought of eating Jesus. And turned away from him. In fact the original translation is not eating His flesh, but gnawing on it. Hardly a reason to leave Our Lord and Savior if the Eucharist is “just Symbolic”. Add in the way that the Early Church Fatgers treated the Eucharist. As THE Body and THE blood of Christ. Plus all the documented Eucharistic Miracles. We know the blood type of Jesus, the Host analyzed human flesh is heart muscke tissue under stress. Etc.

The Eucharist is not a Symbol, it is Jesus. hesus I trust IN You. Not Iteust you, I trust insude you. Having consumed your Body and Blood at communion.

And If the Eucharist was just a symbol, why are we warned Not to take communion if we are not in a state if Grace. Which caused illnesses snd even desths in the early Church? A symbol would not cause illness or death consuming just bread ir wine, when approached doused in mortal sins. Before a propwr vkeansing Confesdion.

God Bless, 🙏✝️🙏

1 more comment...

No posts

Ready for more?